Through surveys of incoming students and prospective students my colleagues at Western Seminary found that the three most important factors considered when people choose a seminary are:
(1) Doctrine
(2) Faculty
(3) Academic Reputation
There is no way for me to know if this is true of everyone considering seminary, but I imagine that doctrine has to play a big part for many people.
Personally, I chose Western Seminary with doctrine a little further down the ladder. When I enrolled at the San Jose campus it had to do first and foremost with my acquaintance with some of the seminary’s alumni. It is one thing to read a brochure; it is something altogether different to be told, “You will enjoy hermeneutics with Dr. Gary Tuck. I know I did!” Also, the campus was near where I lived in San Francisco and I had no plans of leaving the City at that point.
I think I could have been as happy at Fuller Theological Seminary or George Fox Evangelical Seminary as I have been at Western Seminary. In fact, there may have been areas where I would have been more comfortable at these other schools (e.g., the ethos surrounding women in ministry).
Doctrine does matter though. As an enrollment counselor I have learned that for many it comes down to one’s “bibliology.” That seemed to be the major watershed in my experience. Some people will not go to a school where the professors do not speak of Scripture as “inerrant.” Others won’t go to a school where professors speak of Scripture as “inerrant.” They may prefer “infallible” or “trustworthy,” but “inerrant” is far too strong.
Denominational affiliation was not that important, but there was a form of denominationalism that I have seen influence students. They may talk about “Calvinism vs. Arminianism” or they may want to know how many professors are dispensationalist or whether the school is “Reformed.” There are some who want to know if your school is connected to the “emerging church,” and whether you say “yes” or “no” it could determine if they attend your school. Others want to know if you are connected to “The Gospel Coalition” and your answer matters.
Let me express one caveat about prioritizing “doctrine” when selecting a school. You cannot separate doctrine from pedagogy. (I will say more about pedagogy in a future post.) If you attend a seminary that is a little further right or a little further left on the theological spectrum that you are personally (my seminary was further right on many subjects) you can have a wonderful experience if the professors are OK with students having differing opinions.
As a student at Western Seminary I never felt like I had to hold to a certain view to avoid being blacklisted or receiving a bad grade, but I know those types of seminary do exist (from the right and from the left). Be careful to avoid seminaries where the pedagogy is more about downloading information into your mind than it is about teaching you to think. My professors taught me to think. They shared their views, yes indeed, but I was allowed to have mine as well. The only requirement was that I argued my position well and that I showed that I had thought deeply about the subject.
If I were starting my seminary search again I would make a list of doctrinal positions that I prioritize. Create a taxonomy. Does the seminary have to share a certain confession about the nature of the Bible? Should they affirm women in ministry? Do views on the sacraments matter? Do you prefer a small tent seminary or a big tent seminary? This will help you know what seminary may be best for you.
In my next post I will discuss faculty.

August 30, 2012 at 9:50 am
I hate to leave two comments in one week, but I had a thought. While I originally spent my first year in seminary at Fuller, I switched to Brite Divinity School (at TCU) to finish up. I did not choose Brite for doctrinal reasons, though. I chose it because of its location close to my home and for the large tuition breaks afforded by their endowment. I struggled with their doctrine (such as it was) for many years, but upon reflection, I think that it stretched me and prepared me in a different way than if i had attended a seminary that agreed with what I already believed. This might be impossible to know, but I wonder if there is a middle ground between choosing the “right” seminary doctrinally speaking and a need to choose one more “wrong.” I am not sure if I even believe what I just wrote, but there it is. Also, could you speak to the differences between a seminary and a divinity school? The difference between Fuller (a seminary) and Brite (a divinity school) are the only things I have to compare, but the differences between them are vast.
August 30, 2012 at 9:56 am
Chad
I wish that you’d comment more often! You bring useful points to the discussion.
I agree that it can be good to choose a school that teaches something that will stretch you. While I was vague about why doctrine matters I imagine that for many they want a school where they feel comfortable. I am not opposed to this, but I do think it good to have some tension. In the areas where I do not share views with my seminary professors I am far more convinced of those views because I have had a chance to have them challenged.
Honestly, I don’t have a good answer off the top of my head regarding the differences between seminaries and divinity schools. Alma College does provide this useful distinction though (from http://www.alma.edu/student_life/chaplain/theological/faqs):
“A seminary is an independent theological institution. Their primary mission is that of training men and women for ordained ministry. Most, but not all, are affiliated with a denomination (e.g., Presbyterian, Catholic, Lutheran, or Methodist). Most seminaries welcome students regardless of their faith tradition.
A divinity school is a theological institution directly related to a university; it is not necessarily affiliated with a particular denomination. Many students at divinity school are preparing for careers others than ordained ministry, such as college level teaching. At a divinity school, students can take courses in other departments at the university.”
August 30, 2012 at 9:57 am
Brian said: “I think I could have been as happy at Fuller Theological Seminary or George Fox Evangelical Seminary as I have been at Western Seminary.”
Brian also said: “In general, I tend to limit my bias to matters of west coast culture, though now my experience will broaden a bit.”
How do you think Acadia University would have suited you?
August 30, 2012 at 9:58 am
Andrew
I’m sure I would have enjoyed Acadia. My mentor Craig A. Evans teaches there!
August 30, 2012 at 10:13 am
And Nova Scotian Canada is amazing this time of year (Wolfville/Annapolis Royal especially), albeit off the beaten path.
I agree with your response to Chad. My understanding is that the difference between Divinity Schools and Seminary’s is trending towards nothing.
Seminary’s use to be affiliated with particular denominations whether or not they were components of a university (so serviced the theological needs of some denomination)
Divinity schools on the other hand were theological schools belonging to particular universities not often restricted to particular denominational views (so serviced the needs of theological education).
Given Brian’s (and Chad’s) advice to become stretched in one’s theological education – a divinity school is likely the way to go (though I’m not sure it much matters these days)
August 30, 2012 at 10:19 am
Also Brian, once you are done your Phd. I understand (perhaps incorrectly) that the average salaries for professors at Canadian Universities are generally greater than at American Universities (of course, depending on the university).
If career opportunity (meaning salary and standard of living) trump the geographical preferences of you and your wife, you should extend the aperture of your search northward.
August 30, 2012 at 10:22 am
Doctrine, at least as you propose it was not a big consideration for me. I am a 5th generation pastor’s kid. I went to Wheaton for undergrad and felt like I needed something other than conservative Evangelical college. So I went to University of Chicago Divinity school. I really liked the program, but in hind sight I wish I has thought more the faculty before I went. Majority of them were great but primarily interested in the PhD program. A few were a real pain.
What I got most out of that decision to go to a school that was overwhelmingly liberal protestant (although a number of catholics as well), was that there is real active faith from a variety of Christian streams. That has strongly impacted my current (and I think future) plans. But I also consciously made a decision to explore that by going there.
August 30, 2012 at 10:39 am
Andrew
That is a good thought. I think I would be open to teaching in Canada, as long as my achy bones could handle the weather.
Adam
I think choosing to go somewhere that will stretch you doctrinally is a good thing too. There are a dozen other motivations that may factor into choosing a school with doctrinal views close to your own, and those far from your own, but being stretched and challenged isn't a bad thing!
Pingback: Things to consider when choosing a seminary: #2, faculty. | Near Emmaus
Pingback: Things to consider when choosing a seminary: #3, academic reputation. | near Emmaus
Pingback: Things to consider when choosing a seminary: #5, pedagogy. | Near Emmaus
Pingback: Things to consider when choosing a seminary: #6, scheduling. | Near Emmaus