Last week I said that I would be writing several post where I share how I exited from the Oneness Pentecostal movement in order to assist those who are thinking of doing the same (see Pt. 1 here). I have not written this series until now because (1) I don’t think I was ready to write calmly and (2) I have recently realized from conversations with others that some of my brief blog posts on related subjects have helped others transition. I decided to write these not to draw apologist, but rather to show that there is life once you leave to those who want to do so.
I began by discussing the need to be prayerful as you begin planning what to do next (see Pt. 2 here). Today I want to discuss engaging Scripture. Oddly, I have known many Oneness Pentecostals who fear thinking about Scripture other than through the grid provided (i.e. proof-texts that affirm certain preset interpretations). Although I went to a college sponsored by a Oneness Pentecostal organization (the UPCI) the one thing for which I am thankful to my fortmer professors is that they did challenge me to read Scripture and they did let me read other Christians who did not hold to their profession.
In Christianity’s Dangerous Idea: The Protestant Revolution–A History from the Sixteenth Century to the Twenty First (p. 3) author Alister McGrath says this of Protestantism, “Protestantism took its stand on the right of individuals to interpret the Bible for themselves rather than be forced to submit to ‘official’ interpretations handed down by popes and other centralized religious authorities.” Oddly enough in many Oneness Pentecostal churches there is a form of Catholicism that doesn’t have the historical structures to support it. Rather than a Pope in Rome there is often a Pope in every pulpit. What this Pope preaches is almost always ex cathedra. If you disagree you are blacklisted. For being part of Protestantism this sure is dogmatic!
Similarly, this is not like reciting the Westminster Confession. I don’t know any Presbyterians who think that denying that confession is a salvific issue. Yet I do know Oneness Pentecostal preachers who act as if you differ with the canon of David K. Bernard you have committed apostasy that could lead to eternal damnation.
My challenge to a Oneness Pentecostal who ponders staying or leaving is simple: read Scripture. I will say more about this tomorrow, but let me add that you shouldn’t fear the interpretations of other Christians, past and present. If they are wrong, and Oneness Pentecostal dogma is right, then truth will prevail, right? If a pastor tries to prevent the congregation from reading “unapproved” literature then it is my conviction that they have something to hide, if nothing else their own internal doubts and insecurities.
Scripture is the constituting documents of our religion. The canonization of Scripture is something oft debated, but we can agree for the most part that the Spirit has lead the church to maintain a smaller lists of books than what was available because those books most closely mirror the teachings of the early church. In fact, all were written within decades of Christ’s death, burial, resurrection, and ascension. So even if you read as a historian you probably confess that these materials are the closest literature to the thought-world of the first Christians. Either approach leads me to see Scripture as trustworthy.
Read Scripture and read it prayerfully, for yourself, with an open mind, in dialog with others. Again, I am not saying that this will result in your abandoning of your current beliefs. I know many people who I can say are fairly honest about reading Scripture yet who remain some form of Oneness Pentecostal. If that happens, que sera sera. But it could be that you read Luke-Acts and think “Wait, why do all the narratives where people speak in tongues occur only when there are groups?” Maybe you will read the Apostle Paul who asks rhetorically, “Do all speak with tongues?” Maybe you will scratch your head and says, “Why does the first gospel say to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?” Maybe you will come across dozens of passages that ground salvation in faith in Christ and you will meditate upon the “salvation plan” that you have been taught.
I have wrongly been accused of leaving because of academics. Like Paul, “much studying has made me insane”! This is not true. I began to walk away when with an open Bible in a college dorm sponsored by a Oneness Pentecostal organization it became evident to me that I am responsible to read Scripture honestly and I do not find what they teach in Scripture.
Maybe you are experiencing the same thing? Tomorrow I will say a little bit about those “other” Christians who go to Baptist, Four Square, and Methodist churches down the street. They read Scripture too and they profess faith in Christ. Maybe they aren’t as bad as they’ve been made out to be?
May 2, 2011 at 10:25 am
Well said Brian. This series is great because instead of proposing leaving because of knee-jerk reactions to dress standards and other things, you are building a reasoning around scriptural evidence and unscriptural separation from the world-wide Christian body. We all are looking toward the same goal in the end.
May 2, 2011 at 11:27 am
@Josh: I have noticed that all too often this subject is addressed at a sociological level. It is about standards, or spiritual abuse, and other similar topics. I will allude to this, but I think that this is not the root problem, it is the budding flowers. The root is a sectarian attitude toward the rest of the church of God and that leads to all kinds of contention. I believe the honest reader of Scripture will see we have been called to “love one another”.
May 2, 2011 at 1:15 pm
im enjoying your transition brian, a light filled with courage. in my own wrestlings of faith, ur understanding of jesus is enlightening. u remind me to engage with god and to try out my own faith. thanking the unseen god!
May 2, 2011 at 1:24 pm
@Juven: This is why I decided to write this series. It is just me jotting out a few thoughts as I remember my own journey (one that continues in many ways). I know there are more people out there waiting to hear that it is OK to explore other options. I am saying that here and I hope they listen.
Pingback: Walk On: A Guide to Exiting Oneness Pentecostalism (Pt. 4) « Near Emmaus
Pingback: Elsewhere (05.03.2011) « Near Emmaus
May 3, 2011 at 12:26 pm
amazing brian! had I been as eloquent a writer as you, I would have written all these exact words a few years back! much needed and appreciated blogs! thanks so much! a little gray area for me is still speaking in tongues… are holy ghost and holy spirit the same? who speaks in tongues? should everyone? is it actually different from the gift of tongues as we were taught?
May 3, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Heidi: Thank you for the kind words. As concerns the Holy “Ghost” and Holy Spirit, yes, these are one and the same. In Greek it is always pneuma which can be translated spirit, wind, or breath. “Ghost” is misleading in our current vernacular, though it may have been interchangeable with the idea of “Spirit” at the time a version like the KJV was translated.
As fas as who should speak in tongues, I’d say those with the gift of tongues. I think the Apostle Paul is clear that this was a select group by the time he wrote the letters to Corinth (see 1 Cor. 12-14).I don’t think there are two different types of tongues.
Now in the Book of Acts the author has tongues associated with the baptism of the Spirit on a few occasions, but we should note this is specifically a Lukan use of Spirit-language that differs a bit from Paul. Also, if you read the narratives, the only time we see Luke mention tongues is when there are whole groups being baptized in the Spirit. He never mentions tongues when the Ethiopian Eunuch is converted, the jailer in Philippi, or Saul/Paul himself. I have given my reasons for this literary function here: http://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/the-holy-spirit-in-luke-acts/
And here: http://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/2010/07/02/why-i-denounced-the-doctrine-of-initial-evidence/
And here: http://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/why-the-narrative-of-acts-19-1-7/
And here: http://nearemmaus.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/letting-lukan-pneumatology-stand-alone/
May 3, 2011 at 12:57 pm
Brian, your post really does nothing but erect a strawman. Yes, there are bad apples in any barrel but that doesn’t make all apples bad. Your broad brush here is just a mistaken approach in trying to get mileage out of your lack of belief in the One True God.
May 3, 2011 at 12:59 pm
@James: Thanks for sharing your opinion. It isn’t really an apologetic against Oneness Pentecostalism. I assume that my readers of these post are already in agreement that there are problems with the movement in general. You are not in that place.
May 3, 2011 at 1:02 pm
I have close friends who are Oneness and have graduate and post-graduate degrees. Academics isn’t that decisive IMHO. The false characterization that OP’s however neglect Scripture reading and study is false on it face. My church just finished up the book of Galatians chapter by chapter. It may be true from your perspective but your experience is not that of all OP’s by far.
May 3, 2011 at 1:04 pm
@James: That is wonderful to hear. I am sure not every church is the same, but I can’t write about every church. Those who do not share my experience will be disinterested in these posts, but there are plenty who do share it.
Pingback: Elsewhere (05.04.2011) « Near Emmaus
Pingback: Walk On: A Guide to Exiting from Oneness Pentecostalism (Pt. 5) « Near Emmaus
May 5, 2011 at 11:13 am
I may add, James Anderson, that academics are nowhere near equal when you contrast OP’s to other denominations or the rest of the Christianity (since you offered that point).
Most OP’s have fast-track degrees, from diploma mill schools, unaccredited schools or something else that is rather fishy. And the leading theologians of many of the orgs are called “Doctor” and giving high honors, but at a closer look, their Doctoral degrees are in fields unrelated to Biblical Theology. The OP that has an earned, traditional Doctoral degree is an anomaly to be sure.
On our forums we’ve called-out many, some prominent UPC evangelists, who herald themselves as “doctors” and we come to find out they paid $5,000 to a Diploma mill and called it a day.
Fortunately, Pentecostalism in general, on the back of Gordon Fee, has gained a reputation to be concerned with biblical scholarship. But I find the other sub-groups are posturing as academics, but mostly just a veneer for street cred, not true scholarship. I would love to be proved wrong.
I’m surprised any OP church that doesn’t believe in Justification by Faith, can do an exegetical study through the book of Galatians and not feel indicted
Come talk about it at The316.com, JA.
May 6, 2011 at 8:16 am
JD Wilder, I have been to 316 and posted. Where are you? Segraves and French are both OP’s who have legitimate degrees. As I said though Academics is NOT decisive. I don’t need to have a Ph.D to understand God’s message for us as revealed in Scripture. It is easy to create strawmen and mis-characterizations but even if they were true they do not prove one thing to be true or false. Trinitarians by far are the ones attending and running these diploma mills and etc. by majority. Based upon your reason that system is completely false.
May 6, 2011 at 8:21 am
@James: You continue to say that these are “strawmen” and “mis-characterizations”. I will repeat, these posts are not detailed arguments against Oneness Pentecostal dogma. They are more advice based on my own narrative to those who share similar experiences. So quite building the “strawman” that these posts don’t complete a certain task when they are not intended to do.
May 6, 2011 at 8:33 am
Brian, my previous post was in reply to the one made by The 316 and not specifically your thread.
May 6, 2011 at 8:37 am
@James: Thank you for the clarification. While you may (or may not) be disheartened by the presuppositional approach in these posts you know that I have discussed various doctrines of contention elsewhere. I just don’t want to be accused of not addressing the issues directly since I have done this elsewhere (whether satisfactory or not is relative).
Pingback: Walk On: A Guide to Exiting Oneness Pentecostalism (Pt. 6) « Near Emmaus
Pingback: Walk On: A Guide to Exiting from Oneness Pentecostalism (Pt. 7) « Near Emmaus
Pingback: Walk On: A Guide to Exiting from Oneness Pentecostalism (Series Summary) « Near Emmaus