Yesterday I found another wonderful gift from the people over at IVP. In my mailbox was a copy of Timothy G. Gombis’ The Drama of Ephesians: Participating in the Triumph of God. It has been a while since I gave the Epistle to the Ephesians sufficient attention but it has been one of my favorite portions of Scripture to study. Now I have a good reason to rethink my approach to the epistle.
One anti-commentary I greatly enjoyed a few years ago was Colossians Remixed: Subverting the Empire by Brian Walsh and Sylvia C. Keesmaat. It wasn’t mere commentary. It wasn’t relegated to being simply pragmatic. It somehow told the story of the epistle while grounded its message both in history and in the world of the reader. That is an impressive feat!
I see Gombis’ book as being similar. He states in the opening chapter (yes, I’ve already jumped into it) that, “Ephesians is not a doctrinal treatise in the scholastic sense of that term. It is, rather, a drama in which Paul portrays the powerful, reality-altering, cosmos-transforming acts of God in Christ to redeem God’s world and save God’s people for the glory of his name. A narrative approach to Paul’s letter, therefore, is far more appropriate than a scientific approach.” (p. 15). Something inside me says, “Amen”! I enjoy verse-by-verse approaches to Scripture but we added the verses. These letters are organic wholes that tell a particular story and my way of reading leaps for joy when someone writes on Scripture this way.
Once I finish I will say more, but don’t be surprised if I share a little along the way!

October 30, 2010 at 10:58 am
I love love love this book!
October 30, 2010 at 11:15 am
@Brian: You far along?
October 30, 2010 at 11:32 am
Gombis’ approach sounds like something Barth might engage in; say “theological-exegesis”
.
October 30, 2010 at 1:33 pm
@Bobby: There may be some similarities. As I read through that I will think about it, but I know with Walsh and Keesmaat it felt very different that Barth. A car and a pull along wagon are both (a) equipped with four wheel, (b) metallic, (c) squarish, (d) made for moving things from one location to another, (e) capable of carrying various accidents like color, but we know these are two very different things. I don’t think Gombis is doing what Barth did.
October 30, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Clap Clap Clap…. I have been arguing some time that the book is more narrative then it is doctrinal. I will be interested to see if he picks up on Pauls narrative story of the Jew’s coming first and then the Gentiles also are included…
October 30, 2010 at 2:21 pm
@Craig: I will keep an eye out for that theme. I know he says that the war theme is the strand he follows from beginning to end. I will watch to see where that goes.
October 30, 2010 at 10:13 pm
just in a couple chapters so far – just so much to absorb… it is confirming a shift in my own theological thinking (from doctrinal thinking to narrative/drama thinking) and I like the shift!